Plasma and faecal disposition kinetic of moxidectin after oral admnistration in horses

Main Article Content

R. PÉREZ
I. CABEZAS
C. GODOY
L. RUBILAR
L. DÍAZ
L. MUÑOZ
M. ARBOIX
M. ALVINERIE

Abstract

A study was undertaken with the aim to study the plasma disposition kinetic and the faecal excretion profile of moxidectin after oral administration in horses. Five mixedbred saddle horses of 416.8 ± 49.5 kg body weight and positives to the nematodes' faecal eggs count were treated with an oral gel formulation of moxidectin (Equest" ) at doses of 0.4 mg/kg. Blood and faecal samples were collected before and at different times after treatment for a period of 75 days. After solid phase extraction and derivatization samples were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Data were analysed by a computerised kinetic analysis.


The limit of quantification of the method was 0.5 ng/mL and the drug was detected in the plasma between 30 min (33.9 ± 17.8 ng/mL ) to 75 days post administration ( 0.3 ± 0.2 ng/mL ). The analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters showed a short half life of absorption ( t _ ab 0. 84± 0.5 h) and values of maximum concentration (Cmax ) of 68.7 ± 24.1 ng/mL obtained at 0.117 ± 0.07 d (Tmax). The terminal half life of elimination (t _b) was 18.3 ± 3.2 d, which produces a delayed mean residence time (MRT of 19.6 ± 4.6 d). The area under the concentration time curve was 172.3 ± 51.2 ng· d / mL. The mean concentration of moxidectin in faeces ranged between 423.5 ± 570.7 ng/g at 24 h and 0.8 ± 0.8 ng/g 75 d after treatment. The mean maximum faecal concentration (Cmax) 5204.5± 916.5 ng/g was observed at 2.5 d post-treatment. It is concluded that moxidectin has a delayed period of permanency in the organism when it is administered by oral route in horses.

Article Details

How to Cite
PÉREZ, R., CABEZAS, I., GODOY, C., RUBILAR, L., DÍAZ, L., MUÑOZ, L., ARBOIX, M., & ALVINERIE, M. (2001). Plasma and faecal disposition kinetic of moxidectin after oral admnistration in horses. Archivos De Medicina Veterinaria, 33(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2001000100009
Section
ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES