Comparison of two phenotypical methods to segregate resistant and susceptible lambs to parasitic nematodes

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Alvar Cruz-Tamayo
Roberto González-Garduño
Glafiro Torres-Hernández
Carlos M. Becerril-Pérez
Omar Hernández-Mendo
Jacinto Efrén Ramírez-Bribiesca
María E. López-Arellano
Juan J. Vargas-Magaña
Nadia F. Ojeda-Robertos

Resumo

The objective of this study was to compare two segregation methods to select resistant and susceptible female Pelibuey lambs infected naturally with gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) in relation to their haematological and immunological response. For 6 months, faeces and blood samples were taken fortnightly from 40 grazing 5-month-old female lambs. The lambs were classified according to two methods using faecal egg count (FEC) as a phenotypical trait. In the first (reference) method (M3SE, n = 22), resistant (RES) lambs had FEC lower than the mean - 3 standard errors, the susceptible (SUS) lambs levels higher than + 3 standard errors (n = 10) and the intermediate (INT) lambs (n = 8) were categorised by having FECs between the two values. The second method (QUM) divided the population, using quartiles, into resistant (RES; 25%), intermediate (INT; 50%), and susceptible (SUS; 25%) lambs. The agreement between both methods was estimated using the Kappa index. The packed cell volume (PCV), total plasma protein (TPP) and peripheral eosinophils (EOS) were determined for each group. Serum was used to evaluate the IgA levels. PCV and TPP values were higher (P<0.01) in the RES lambs (31.5 ± 3.4 and 6.16 ± 0.5 g/dL by QUM, respectively, and 31.5 ± 3.9 and 6.24 ± 0.49 g/dL by M3SE, respectively) than the SUS lambs (28.1 ± 4.7 and 5.94 ± 0.5 g/d, respectively, by both methods). The EOS and IgA values increased with age. M3SE and QUM were in moderate agreement (Kappa = 0.43). We concluded that the two segregation methods allowed for the identification of the same female SUS lambs, but a greater number of animals were categorised phenotypically as resistant using the M3SE method. PCV and TPP can help to identify phenotypically resistant animals.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Cruz-Tamayo, A., González-Garduño, R., Torres-Hernández, G., Becerril-Pérez, C. M., Hernández-Mendo, O., Ramírez-Bribiesca, J. E., López-Arellano, M. E., Vargas-Magaña, J. J., & Ojeda-Robertos, N. F. (2020). Comparison of two phenotypical methods to segregate resistant and susceptible lambs to parasitic nematodes. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 52(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322020000100103
Seção
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Biografia do Autor

Alvar Cruz-Tamayo, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México; Escuela Superior de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Escárcega, Campeche, México.

Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.
Escuela Superior de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Escárcega, Campeche, México.

Roberto González-Garduño, Unidad Regional Universitaria Suroeste, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Tabasco, México.

Unidad Regional Universitaria Suroeste, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Tabasco, México.

Glafiro Torres-Hernández, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Carlos M. Becerril-Pérez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Omar Hernández-Mendo, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Jacinto Efrén Ramírez-Bribiesca, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Montecillo, Estado de México, México.

María E. López-Arellano, Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Salud Animal e Inocuidad, INIFAP, Morelos, México.

Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Salud Animal e Inocuidad, INIFAP, Morelos, México.

Juan J. Vargas-Magaña, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Escárcega, Campeche, México.

Escuela Superior de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Escárcega, Campeche, México.

Nadia F. Ojeda-Robertos, División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, México.

División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, México.

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)