Inter-male variability in sperm cryotolerance of Saanen bucks assessed using a purpose-built Sperm Quality Index
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8750-8399
Resumen
Sperm cryopreservation is an essential tool for animal breeding and genetic conservation programs. However, the freeze–thaw process induces structural and functional alterations that compromise sperm survival and fertilizing ability. Although inter–individual variability in sperm cryotolerance has been widely reported in livestock species, integrative approaches for evaluating semen freezability in goats remain limited. Therefore, the present study evaluated sperm cryotolerance in Saanen bucks using composite Sperm Quality Indexes (SQI) derived from multiple post-thaw sperm functional parameters. A total of 124 ejaculates from seven adult Saanen bucks were cryopreserved and evaluated after thawing for progressive motility, viability, acrosome integrity, capacitation status, and plasma membrane fluidity. Two indices were calculated: SQI1, which includes parameters associated with sperm functionality preservation, and SQI2, which includes indicators of cryo-induced cellular damage. Significant inter–male differences were observed for both indices (P < 0.05). Male 1 exhibited lower SQI1 values and higher SQI2 values than males 6 and 7, indicating reduced sperm cryotolerance and increased susceptibility to cryo–induced membrane destabilization and capacitation–like changes. The remaining males showed intermediate responses without significant differences among them. The proposed SQIs successfully detected biologically meaningful inter-male differences in sperm cryotolerance and constitute a useful approach for identifying bucks with different freezing responses.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Referencias
Bailey, J. L., Bilodeau, J. F., & Cormier, N. (2000). Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: A damaging and capacitating phenomenon. Journal of Andrology, 21(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03268.x
Berean, D. I., Bogdan, L. M., & Cimpean, R. (2024). Advancements in Understanding and Enhancing Antioxidant-Mediated Sperm Cryopreservation in Small Ruminants: Challenges and Perspectives. Antioxidants, 13(6), 624. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13060624
Bucak, M. N., Tuncer, P. B., Sarıözkan, S., & Ulutaş, P. A. (2009). Comparison of the effects of glutamine and an amino acid solution on post-thawed ram sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activities. Small Ruminant Research, 81, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.10.003
Cabrera, F., González, F., Batista, M., Calero, P., Medrano, A., & Gracia, A. (2005). The effect of removal of seminal plasma, egg yolk level and season on sperm freezability of Canary buck (Capra hircus). Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 40(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00544.x
Cardenas-Padilla, A. J., Jimenez-Trejo, F., Cerbon, M., & Medrano, A. (2024a). The Role of Melatonin on Caprine (Capra hircus) Sperm Freezability: A Review. Antioxidants, 13(12), 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13121466
Cardenas-Padilla, A. J., Jimenez-Trejo, F., Cerbon, M., Chavez-Garcia, A., Cruz-Cano, N. B., Martinez-Torres, M., Alcantar-Rodriguez, A., & Medrano, A. (2024b). Sperm melatonin receptors, seminal plasma melatonin and semen freezability in goats. Theriogenology, 225, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.05.034
Cardenas-Padilla, A. J., & Medrano, A. (2025). Sperm freezability is associated with melatonin receptor expression in the sperm plasma membrane of Saanen goat bucks (Capra hircus). Veterinary World, 18, 3520–3535. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.3520-3535
Casas, I., Sancho, S., Briz, M., Pinart, E., Bussalleu, E., Yeste, M., & Bonet, S. (2009). Freezability prediction of boar ejaculates assessed by functional sperm parameters and sperm proteins. Theriogenology, 72(7), 930-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.07.001
Hai, E., Li, B., Zhang, J., & Zhang J. (2024). Sperm freezing damage: the role of regulated cell death. Cell Death Discovery, 10, 239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-02013-3
Li, C., Lv, C., Larbi, A., Liang, J., Yang, Q., Wu, G., & Quan, G. (2024). Revisiting the Injury Mechanism of Goat Sperm Caused by the Cryopreservation Process from a Perspective of Sperm Metabolite Profiles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(16), 9112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25169112
Morrell, J. M., & Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (2011). Practical applications of sperm selection techniques as a tool for improving reproductive efficiency. Veterinary Medicine International, 2011, 894767. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/894767
Parks, J. E., & Graham, J. K. (1992). Effects of cryopreservation procedures on sperm membranes. Theriogenology, 38(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90231-F
Perumal, P., Barik, A. K., Mohanty, D. N., Das, S., Mishra, P. C., & Chang, S. (2016). Comparison of semen characteristics of good and poor freezable Jersey crossbred bulls. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 7(5), 1177–1180. https://doi.org/10.23910/IJBSM/2016.7.5.1459
Purdy, P. H. (2006). A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Ruminant Research, 63(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.015
Salamon, S., & Maxwell, W. M. C. (2000). Storage of ram semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 62, 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00155-X
Sharma, A., & Sood, P. (2020). Caprine semen cryopreservation and the factors affecting it: An overview. Veterinary Sciences: Research and Reviews, 6, 46–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.vsrr/2020/6.1.46.57
Watson, P. F. (2000). The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 60–61, 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3
Xu, B., Wang, R., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Su, R., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). Evaluation of lipidomic change in goat sperm after cryopreservation. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 1004683. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1004683
Xue, S. H., Xu, B. B., Yan, X. C., Zhang, J. X., & Su, R. (2025). Sperm membrane stability: In-depth analysis from structural basis to functional regulation. Veterinary Sciences, 12(7), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12070658
Yáñez-Ortiz, I., Catalán, J., Rodríguez-Gil, J. E., Miró, J., & Yeste, M. (2022). Advances in sperm cryopreservation in farm animals: Cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Animal Reproduction Science, 246, 106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106904
Yi, X., Qiu, Y., Tang, X., Lei, Y., Pan, Y., Raza, S.H.A., Althobaiti, N.A., Albalawi, A.E., Abdulmonem, W.A., Makhlof, R.T.M., Alsaad, A.A., Zhang, Y., & Sun, X. (2024). Effect of Five Different Antioxidants on the Effectiveness of Goat Semen Cryopreservation. Reproductive Sciences, 31, 1958–1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01452-8
Zang, S., Zou, S., Chen, X., Pan, B., Ning, A., Qin, J., Wei, Y., Du, K., Ye, J., Liang, Q., Fang, Y., Qiongla, C., Song, T., & Zhou, G. (2025). Abnormalities in mitochondrial energy metabolism induced by cryopreservation negatively affect goat sperm motility. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11, 1514362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1514362