Un acercamiento a las creencias docentes sobre creatividad: aplicación de un instrumento psicométrico en contexto latinoamericano
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El presente estudio analiza la validez y confiabilidad del instrumento Beliefs About Teaching for Creativity Scale (BATCS) en el contexto chileno. La investigación tuvo como propósito explorar la estructura factorial y la consistencia interna de la escala desarrollada por Katz-Buonincontro et al. (2020, 2021), que evalúa cinco dimensiones de las creencias docentes sobre creatividad: deseabilidad, autoeficacia, mentalidad fija y de crecimiento, y valor de la creatividad para los estudiantes. Participaron 251 docentes de distintos niveles educativos. Los resultados muestran niveles adecuados de confiabilidad y un ajuste aceptable del modelo de cinco factores. No obstante, se observaron particularidades en la dimensión de valor y en la relación entre mentalidades fija y de crecimiento, lo que sugiere diferencias culturales respecto de otros contextos. Los hallazgos respaldan la validez del instrumento y, a la vez, indican la necesidad de posibles ajustes conceptuales y lingüísticos para su aplicación en América Latina.
Detalles del artículo
Datos de los fondos
-
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Números de la subvención 11240401
Referencias
Barahona, E. (2004). Estudio de Validez del Cuestionario de Prácticas Pedagógicas Para la Creatividad (CPPC). Psykhe (Santiago), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282004000100013
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., y Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.09.002
Canina, M., Bruno, C., & Glaveanu, V. P. (2023). Innovating in the Post-Anthropocene Era: A New Framework for Creativity (pp. 439–460). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28206-5_17
Chen, K., Chen, J., & Wang, C. (2023). The effects of two empathy strategies in design thinking on pre-service teachers’ creativity. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 15(3), 468–486. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.027
Díaz-Díaz, M. S., Sanz, Y. E., Niclós, I. P., Sanchis, E. I., & Martín-Ezpeleta, A. (2025). Inservice teachers’ beliefs and self-perceptions of creativity. A comparative study between Chile and Spain. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v18i1.3019
DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2014). A Comparison of Diagonal Weighted Least Squares Robust Estimation Techniques for Ordinal Data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373
Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset : the new psychology of success. Random House.
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
Fives, H., & Gill, G. (2014). International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs. Routladge.
Glaveanu, V. (2021). Creativity. A very short introduction (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hu, L., y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ibrayeva, L., Helmer, J., & CohenMiller, A. (2022). “Thinking outside the Yurt”: Kazakhstani upper secondary school teachers’ beliefs about the nature of creativity and creative students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101176
Izquierdo-Sanchis, E., Echegoyen-Sanz, Y., & Martín-Ezpeleta, A. (2025). Búsqueda y resolución creativa de problemas en Educación Primaria. Influencia del género, curso y centro. Educación XX1, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.39907
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034898
Katz-Buonincontro, J., Hass, R., Kettler, T., Tang, L. M., & Hu, W. (2021). Partial measurement invariance of beliefs about teaching for creativity across U.S. and Chinese educators. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12379
Katz-Buonincontro, J., Hass, R. W., & Perignat, E. (2020). Measuring Beliefs About Teaching for Creativity. Teachers College Record, 122, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200701
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Lidueña Genez, D. J., & Alcocer Aparicio, P. M. (2024). Cultura Maker: Una revisión teórica de las tendencias educativas que proponen este enfoque para desarrollar creatividad en estudiantes de secundaria. Revista Latinoamericana de Calidad Educativa, 1(3), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.70625/rlce/112
Ministerio de Educación. (2024). Bases curriculares de 1.° Básico a 2.° Medio. Propuesta de actualización para consulta pública 2024. Recuperado el 17 de octubre de 2025, de https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/recursos/informe-ejecutivo-consulta-publica-actualizacion-curricular
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Patston, T. J., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity: Is there an arts bias? Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.001
Revelle, W. (2024). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research
[R package]. CRAN. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.psych
Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit Self-Theories in the Academic Domain: Implications for Goal Orientation, Attributions, Affect, and Self-Esteem Change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313–336.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Rubenstein, L. D., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for Creativity Scales: An Instrument to Examine Teachers’ Perceptions of Factors That Allow for the Teaching of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.813807
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sawyer, R. K., & Heriksen, D. (2024). Explaining Creativity. The Science of Human Innovation (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. In Source: The Academy of Management Journal (Vol. 45, Issue 6).
Warne, R. (2014). A primer on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for behavioral scientists. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 19, 1–10.